Balaber-Strauss v. Town/Village of Harrison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing due process claims because “[t]he [c]omplaint contained] no allegations supporting th[o]se alleged constitutional violations”
• dismissing First Amendment retaliation claim when Complaint failed to allege that plaintiff refrained from speaking at the public Town meeting after defendants engaged in “smear campaign”
• “Allegations of a subjective ‘chill’ are not an adequate substitute for a claim of specific present objective harm or a threat of specific future harm.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).