Baker v. Wood, Ris & Hames, Professional Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that fraudulent concealment claims must be pleaded with particularity under Rule 9(b) of the Federal and Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure
• finding the beneficiaries of a testator's estate-planning documents lacked standing in a legal malpractice case against the documents' drafter
• “Colorado courts have consistently required all claims sounding in fraud to be pleaded with particularity.”
• “Colorado law recognizes that a person not a party to an express contract may bring an action on the contract if the parties to the agreement intended to benefit the non-party, provided that the benefit claimed is a direct and not merely incidental benefit of the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).