Skip to main content
· 3/31/2003

Baker v. Urban Outfitters, Inc.

Citations

  • 254 F. Supp. 2d 346
  • 60 Fed. R. Serv. 1606
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4801
  • 2003 WL 1733778

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding “past licensing can serve as a benchmark for measuring the fair market value of a reasonable license fee”
  • expert’s evidence of fee for commissioned photography was irrelevant and unreliable as evidence relating to use of fee for use of pre-existing stock photography
  • reasonable licensing fee was appropriate even though the plaintiff “initially stated that he has only worked on assignment and has not sold or licensed photography in his career”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Preska

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.