Baker v. United States Parole Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “controlling precedent forecloses Baker’s argument that revocation of street time can violate the Ex Post Facto clause, as revoking street time does not constitute increasing a sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).