Baker v. Surman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, because reasonable persons could differ as to whether the real estate agent should have known the assurances given by the seller were false, the misrepresentation claim should have been submitted to the jury
• directed verdict for showing agent who relied upon listing information, only visited property once and informed buyers of his source of information
• “[A] buyer cannot rely upon an FHA appraisal as a warranty of the value or condition of the home. The primary and predominant objective of the FHA appraisal system is the protection of the government and its insurance funds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).