Baker v. State
Citations
- 82 Miss. 84
Syllabus
<p>1. Criminal Law. Rape. Evidence. Reputation for chastity.</p> <p>In a prosecution for rape it is error to permit the state to show:</p> <p>(а) That prosecutrix was a chaste woman, her general reputation in that regard not having been assailed by defendant;</p> <p>(б) That defendant ill treated members of his household, where such evidence does not tend to explain delay in the prosecution ;</p> <p>(e) That a witness not called by the defense had been told by defendant that she would have to swear lies to help him out; and</p> <p>(d) That witness had heard noises indicating distress at defendant’s house, they not knowing what made the noises or why they were made.</p> <p>2. Same. Delay in prosecution.</p> <p>Long delay in presecuting for rape demands a close scrutiny of the testimony before conviction.</p>
Judges: Wiiiteield
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Thames v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1954-06-14· cited 32×
- Mattox v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1962-02-26· cited 14×
- State v. UhlsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1926-10-09· cited 8×
- State v. AveenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1969-07-25· cited 6×
- People v. LongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1912-05-15
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.