Skip to main content

Baker v. State

Citations

  • 404 So. 2d 1151

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that conclusory and uncorroborated postconviction claims alleging incompetency were insufficient to warrant an evidentiary hearing
  • recognizing that conclusory and uncorroborated postconviction claims alleging 9 incompetency were insufficient to warrant an evidentiary hearing
  • “mental disorder” and other such terms, unrelated to objective symptoms and time and place of trial are mere vague claims and conclusions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cowart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.