Skip to main content

Baker v. State

Citations

  • 327 So. 2d 288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that reason for making objection contemporaneously with event complained of is so that court can more accurately know what transpired and not have to rely on its memory, which may be clouded by subsequent testimony
  • Contemporaneous objection is necessary to preserve the right to raise an error on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patterson, Inzer and Walker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.