Skip to main content

Baker v. State

Citations

  • 388 S.E.2d 402
  • 193 Ga. App. 498
  • 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 1535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even if court’s limitation on cross-examination improperly excluded relevant evidence, defendant was not entitled to reversal of his conviction because he failed to demonstrate that the court’s ruling was harmful
  • where evidence of four meetings between defendant and an undercover drug agent, over a three-month period subsequent to the charged sale of drugs, was held inadmissible in the absence of notice under USCR 31.3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beasley, Carley, McMurray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.