Baker v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that appearance of attorneys on behalf of the State at preliminary matters where attorneys possessed privileged information secured from the appellant by reason of their former services requires reversal despite the attorneys' minimal involvement in the case
• suggesting in dicta that if a probationer were arrested without a warrant for probation violation, he would be entitled to a Riverside hearing within forty-eight hours

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Byrd v. Caswell
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2001-10-16· cited 22×
• Hampton v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2009-02-23· cited 21×
• Grimes v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2011-05-04· cited 12×
• Frazier v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2003-01-22· cited 2×
• Opinion No.
  Arkansas Attorney General Reports· 1999-05-07

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Morrissey v. Brewer
  Supreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 10,835×
• Gagnon v. Scarpelli
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 5,755×
• Baker v. McCollan
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-26· cited 5,659×
• County of Riverside v. McLaughlin
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-20· cited 1,546×
• Woods v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1974-09-03· cited 28×
• Pickens v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1989-09-15· cited 15×
• Wilson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1980-12-18· cited 11×
• McCauley v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1991-07-02· cited 7×
• Jordan v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1971-02-10· cited 5×
• Gore v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1971-03-17· cited 3×