Baker v. National Interstate Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that the use of the disjunctive conjunction \or\ between two phrases following an exclusionary clause makes it clear that the exclusion applies to either phrase
• where the court concluded that the “products-completed operations hazard” provision excluded coverage for injuries arising from the insured’s negligent work off premises, i.e., the inspection of a bus
• where the court concluded that the \products-completed operations hazard\ provision excluded coverage for injuries arising from the insured's negligent work off premises, i.e., the inspection of a bus
• “If the language of the policy is not ambiguous, then the coverage inquiry ends, and the court determines coverage by applying the plain meaning of the unambiguous provisions of the policy”
• interpreting “products-completed operations hazard” exclusion in policy as unambiguous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).