Baker v. Monsanto Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because defendant made general appearance when it answered plaintiff’s complaint within limitations period, intervenors’ claims were not barred
• holding that because defendant made general appearance when it answered plaintiff’s complaint within limitations period, intervenors’ claims were not barred
• holding that because defendant made general appearance when it answered plaintiff = s complaint within limitations period, intervenors = claims were not barred
• noting that entering “general appearance in action waives any defect in the manner of service”
• stating that the filing of an answer constitutes a general appearance, which submits a defendant to the jurisdiction of the court for all purposes
• stating that the filing of an answer constitutes a general appearance, which submits a defendant to the jurisdiction of the court for all purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).