Skip to main content
· 1/31/1997

Baker v. Lamb, Leiby & MacRae

Citations

  • 105 F.3d 1102
  • 79 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1296
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1626

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendants could not enforce forum selection clause against nonparty where defendants failed to demonstrate a close connection between the nonparty and signatory
  • holding that counterparties cannot be bound to a third-party contract unless the entities are so closely related that being bound to the contract becomes foreseeable
  • applying the closely related analysis to determine that parties were not closely related and thus, could not enforce the forum-selection clause
  • applying the closely related analysis to determine that parties were not closely related and thus, could not enforce the forum-selection clause
  • declining to resolve the issue as state and federal law were aligned
  • discussing when a forum selection clause can be enforced by non-signatories

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.