Baker v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that summary judgment for the employer is appropriate where “[t]he only evidence offered by plaintiff is that if he had not been terminated, he would have been able to accrue additional benefits.”
• Granting summary judgment for employer where employee showed only that discharge resulted in smaller pension

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).