Baker v. Howard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that premium finance company followed the provisions of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 58-35-85 and effectively cancelled the insured’s policy
• holding that, as a matter of law, premium-finance company canceled insurance policy by mailing notice of cancellation to insurer through its agent, even though statute required that the notice be sent to and received by the “insurer”
• “The applicable statute provides for cancellation of the insurance contract ‘upon receipt of a copy of the request for cancellation notice by the insurer’. Thus, the policy in question was not cancelled until Piedmont, as agent for Canal, received the Notice of Cancellation on 2 January 1997.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).