Skip to main content
· 6/20/1975

Baker v. Hazen

Citations

  • 341 A.2d 707
  • 133 Vt. 433
  • 1975 Vt. LEXIS 426

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • if it cannot be clearly demonstrated that one falls within dual office-holding proscription or is in violation of its purpose, he is entitled to be held free of its prohibition
  • if it cannot be clearly demonstrated that one falls within dual office-holding proscription or is in violation of its purpose, he is entitled to be held free of its prohibition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barney, Smith, Keyser, Daley, Larrow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.