· 6/20/1975
Baker v. Hazen
Citations
- 341 A.2d 707
- 133 Vt. 433
- 1975 Vt. LEXIS 426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- if it cannot be clearly demonstrated that one falls within dual office-holding proscription or is in violation of its purpose, he is entitled to be held free of its prohibition
- if it cannot be clearly demonstrated that one falls within dual office-holding proscription or is in violation of its purpose, he is entitled to be held free of its prohibition
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barney, Smith, Keyser, Daley, Larrow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.