Skip to main content
· 10/15/1806

Baker v. Gallagher

Citations

  • 2 F. Cas. 461
  • 1 Wash. C. C. 461

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the claimant's Thurber argument was unavailing because unlike in Thurber the medical opinion in Anderson was procured prior to the issuance of the most recent SOC or SSOC
  • noting that the claimant’s Thurber argument was unavailing because unlike in Thurber the medical opinion in Anderson was procured prior to the issuance of the most recent SOC or SSOC
  • finding no fair-process violation where the veteran and his counsel had opportunities to raise arguments to the Board but declined to do so
  • discussing Secretary’s obligation to provide to claimants copies of documents in custody of VA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peters, Washington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.