· 10/15/1806
Baker v. Gallagher
Citations
- 2 F. Cas. 461
- 1 Wash. C. C. 461
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the claimant's Thurber argument was unavailing because unlike in Thurber the medical opinion in Anderson was procured prior to the issuance of the most recent SOC or SSOC
- noting that the claimant’s Thurber argument was unavailing because unlike in Thurber the medical opinion in Anderson was procured prior to the issuance of the most recent SOC or SSOC
- finding no fair-process violation where the veteran and his counsel had opportunities to raise arguments to the Board but declined to do so
- discussing Secretary’s obligation to provide to claimants copies of documents in custody of VA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peters, Washington
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.