Baker v. FAMILY CREDIT COUNSELING COPR.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that \whether tort and contract claims are separate and distinct can be a factually intensive inquiry\ (quotations omitted)
• discussing that this relationship exists when someone is in a position \of advisor or counselor as reasonably to inspire confidence that he will act in good faith for the other's interest\
• discerning whether defendants were credit repair organizations after they argued that they did not fall within the statutory definition of the same
• “The claim of unjust enrichment simply requires that plaintiff ‘confer’ benefits on a defendant; it does not require that plaintiff ‘directly confer’ those benefits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).