Baker v. Ducker
Citations
- 79 Cal. 365
- 21 P. 764
- 1889 Cal. LEXIS 735
Syllabus
<p>Corporation—Religious Society—Reformed Church of Stockton— Fraudulent Change of Denomination — Action by Members — Pleading. —In an action to recover for the use of members of the First Reformed Church of the City of Stockton a lot of land with the dwelling-house thereon, which was purchased and formerly used as a parsonage of the church, a complaint stating in substance that the plaintiffs and their associates, for whose benefit the action is also prosecuted, are a religious society in full membership with a national religious society known „as the Reformed Church in the United States; that they were organized for the purpose of teaching the gospel according to the particular tenets of that church, as embodied in the Heidelberg Catechism, and were duly incorporated, under the name of the First Reformed Church of the City of Stockton; that the said corporation purchased the property with donated funds for a residence for its pastors, and for no other purpose; and that the defendants had fraudulently conspired to change the name of said corporation to that of the First German Evangelical Lutheran Zion Society of Stockton, for the purpose of repudiating the tenets of said Reformed Church, and of diverting the property from the use to which it was dedicated, for the support of the Lutheran Church, which has a different doctrine, different church government, and different laws from those of the Reformed Church, and that defendants are now holding and using the same, as trustees of said Lutheran Church, as a residence for the pastors of said Lutheran Church, — states a cause of action, and is not indefinite and uncertain in not stating particularly wherein the doctrinal standards of the two churches differ.</p> <p>Id. —Parties — Suing for Benefit of Many. —The complaint in such action averring that plaintiffs, together with a large number of other persons, are associated together for religious purposes, and are members of the First Reformed Church of the City of Stock
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A case is moot evidence was sufficient to support the Hearing Panel’s conclusions because the judge resigned from office after the Hearing Panel issued its Report and Recommendation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Belcher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.