Baker v. City of Dacono

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[B]ecause th[e] thirty-day filing requirement is jurisdictional, a C.R.C.P. 106(a)(4) action not filed within the . . . limitations period must be dismissed for lack of subject matter 2 Rule 106(a)(4
• court would not read a requirement into Rule 106 that did not exist

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).