Baker v. BP America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the disqualification of an attorney and his law firm was warranted in view of the attorney’s significant involvement in the events underlying the suit, as well as the fact that the attorney would likely be an important witness for several of the parties
• finding disqualification of an attorney and his firm appropriate because of the attorney's involvement in underlying events
• disqualifying attorney with significant involvement in events underlying lawsuit and therefore likely to be important witness for several parties whose testimony “might not strictly support his clients’ factual contentions” and whose credibility might be in issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bartech Industries, Inc. v. International Baking Co.
  E.D. Tennessee· 1996-01-08· cited 15×
• Hamrick v. UNION TP., OHIO
  S.D. Ohio· 2000-01-12· cited 12×
• In Re Sheehan
  N.D. Ohio· 1996-05-22· cited 1×
• Sanders v. Rosenberg
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1995-04-06· cited 1×
• Net 2 Press, Inc. v. 58 Dix Avenue Corp.
  D. Maine· 2002-12-12· cited 1×
• Salatin v. Trans Healthcare of Ohio, Inc.
  N.D. Ohio· 2002-06-03
• Weadock v. Taha
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-01

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. Koller
  Supreme Court· 1985-06-17· cited 814×
• Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,496, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,186 Thorburn Kennedy, Trustee v. Josephthal & Company, Inc., Edward M. Swartz and Fredric Swartz
  First Circuit· 1987-03-26· cited 280×
• Royal American Managers, Incorporated v. Irc Holding Corporation and Joseph Ambriano, Cross-Appellants, Gerald Dolman, Cross-Appellee
  Second Circuit· 1989-09-01· cited 154×
• Mentor Lagoons, Inc. v. Rubin
  Ohio Supreme Court· 1987-07-15· cited 116×
• Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,517 Margaret R. Bruschi v. Ken Brown, Elmco, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1989-07-12· cited 102×
• General Mill Supply Company, Manual Rotenberg and Milton Rotenberg, Plaintiffs v. Sca Services, Inc., Hale and Dorr
  Sixth Circuit· 1983-03-14· cited 96×
• Molecular Technology Corp. v. Valentine
  Sixth Circuit· 1991-02-11· cited 62×
• Paretti v. Cavalier Label Co., Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1989-08-08· cited 26×
• In Re Petition for Mandamus by Everett Mechem
  Sixth Circuit· 1989-07-25· cited 24×
• F.L. Kahle v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., a Delaware Corporation
  Sixth Circuit· 1985-01-08· cited 12×
• Gary Plastic Packaging Corp. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
  S.D. New York· 1988-02-10· cited 12×
• Banque Arabe Et Internationale D'Investissement v. Ameritrust Corp.
  S.D. Ohio· 1988-04-29· cited 11×
• Acme Analgesics, Ltd. v. LEMMON COMPANY
  S.D. New York· 1985-02-08· cited 6×
• Baker v. BP America, Inc.
  N.D. Ohio· 1990-10-23· cited 5×
• Liess v. General Electric Co.
  N.D. Illinois· 1987-05-14· cited 4×
• Gary Plastic Packaging Corporation v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1990-05-14· cited 2×

Other cases named Baker v. BP America, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Baker v. BP America, Inc.
  N.D. Ohio· 1990-10-23· cited 5×