Skip to main content
· 5/24/1991

Baker v. BP America, Inc.

Citations

  • 768 F. Supp. 208
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8712
  • 1991 WL 114112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the disqualification of an attorney and his law firm was warranted in view of the attorney’s significant involvement in the events underlying the suit, as well as the fact that the attorney would likely be an important witness for several of the parties
  • finding disqualification of an attorney and his firm appropriate because of the attorney's involvement in underlying events
  • disqualifying attorney with significant involvement in events underlying lawsuit and therefore likely to be important witness for several parties whose testimony “might not strictly support his clients’ factual contentions” and whose credibility might be in issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aldrich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.