Skip to main content
· 12/19/2003

Baker v. Alabama Department of Public Safety

Citations

  • 296 F. Supp. 2d 1299
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dis- missing UCL claims base on lack of antitrust standing for plaintiffs’ Sherman Act claims
  • “Once a claim has been assigned . . . the assignee is the owner and the assignor generally lacks standing to sue on it.”
  • “Courts in this Circuit .. . have permitted defendants moving to dismiss an amended 25 ||complaint to make arguments previously made and to raise new arguments that were previously available.”
  • “In so far as 1 competition, they may pursue their own UCL claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Albritton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.