· 10/13/1931
Baker Perkins Co. v. Thomas Roulston, Inc.
Citations
- 52 F.2d 799
- 11 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 81
- 1931 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1701
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “statements that function as legally operative conduct” are not barred by the rule against hearsay
- “If a witness says ‘X’ on the stand, his out-of-court statement ‘not-X’ impeaches him, whether X is true or not.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Galston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.