Skip to main content
· 10/13/1931

Baker Perkins Co. v. Thomas Roulston, Inc.

Citations

  • 52 F.2d 799
  • 11 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 81
  • 1931 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1701

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “statements that function as legally operative conduct” are not barred by the rule against hearsay
  • “If a witness says ‘X’ on the stand, his out-of-court statement ‘not-X’ impeaches him, whether X is true or not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Galston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.