Baker Ice Machine Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We indulge in the usual presumption that in a bench trial in a criminal case the court considered only the relevant, material, and competent evidence in arriving at its judgment unless it affirmatively appears to the contrary”
• held that a defendant has a right to an in camera inspection by trial court to determine the existence of inconsistencies between testimony of prosecution’s witnesses and prior statements
• “We indulge in the usual presumption that in a bench trial in a criminal case the court considered only the relevant, 42 January Term, 2016 material, and competent evidence in arriving at its judgment unless it affirmatively appears to the contrary”
• “We indulge in the usual presumption that in a bench trial in a criminal case the court considered only the relevant, material, and competent evidence in arriving at its judgment unless it affirmatively appears to the contrary.”
• a reviewing court will “indulge in the usual presumption that in a bench trial in a criminal case the court considered only the relevant, material, and competent evidence in arriving at its judgment unless it affirmatively appears to the contrary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).