Baker Ex Rel. Baker v. International Harvester Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that the product was not used as intended or anticipated, and later stating as an afterthought, without support, that a manufacturer \has no duty to warn of unintended use\
• reasoning that the product was not used as intended or anticipated, and later stating as an afterthought, without support, that a manufacturer “has no duty to warn of unintended use”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).