Skip to main content
· 4/21/1992

Bakali v. Bakali

Citations

  • 830 S.W.2d 251
  • 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 1348
  • 1992 WL 86330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • grounds upon which bill of review can be obtained are narrow because procedure conflicts with fundamental policy that judgments must become final at some point
  • “Because husband could have recovered attorney’s fees if wife had appealed the divorce decree, the trial court did not err in awarding attorney’s fees in this bill of review proceeding.”
  • “Because husband could have recovered attorney’s fees if wife had appealed the divorce decree, the trial court did not err in awarding attorney’s fees in this bill of review proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stewart, Chapman, Kaplan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.