Bakalar v. Vavra

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• (1) whether trial is imminent, (2) whether the request is opposed, (3) whether the non-moving party would be prejudiced, (4) whether the moving party was diligent in obtaining discovery within the guidelines established by the court, (5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Moroughan v. Cnty. of Suffolk
  E.D. New York· 2018-06-22· cited 43×
• BAKALAR v. Vavra
  S.D. New York· 2011-08-17· cited 18×
• Watt v. All Clear Business Solutions, LLC
  District of Columbia· 2012-01-13· cited 15×
• Davis v. NYS Department of Corrections Attica Correctional Facility P.O. Box 149 Attica, N.Y. 14001
  W.D. New York· 2014-09-12· cited 8×
• Reif v. Nagy
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2017-04-18· cited 5×
• Bridgeforth v. City of N.Y.
  S.D. Illinois· 2017-12-22· cited 2×

Other cases named Bakalar v. Vavra

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Bakalar v. Vavra
  Second Circuit· 2010-09-02· cited 30×
• Bakalar v. Vavra
  S.D. New York· 2006-07-28· cited 23×
• BAKALAR v. Vavra
  S.D. New York· 2011-08-17· cited 18×
• Bakalar v. Vavra
  S.D. New York· 2008-05-30· cited 8×