Baise v. Puckett
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 508
Syllabus
The trial court's finding of an implied contract was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where roofer provided quotes for services (which were not signed by the customer), payment was made to the roofer, and the roofer began providing the quoted services. While the roofer incorrectly asserted in his complaint that he had a written contract with his customer, the complaint still put his customer on notice of the nature of the action and the roofer's claim to relief of money damages for services provided. The record also reflected the parties never questioned the nature of their dispute and claims to relief.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a motion to quash a grand jury 3 subpoena falls within the “capable of repetition yet evades review” exception to 4 mootness (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.