Baird v. Reese

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of match between defendant’s blood type and physical evidence must be excluded “in view of the large proportion of the general population having blood of this type”
• finding blood grouping test results “of no probative value” but holding their admission nonprejudicial in light of unspecified limiting instructions and “the fully adequate case made out by other proof against the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).