Baird v. Lent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the insurer’s “knowledge of the falsity of the statements in the application for reinstatement would not establish waiver ... of the express condition upon which the policy was reinstated ... ”
• explaining that “[t]he continuance of the defendant’s obligation under the policy, . . . according to its terms, was conditional upon the payment of premiums as provided therein” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).