· 8/22/2011
Baird v. Holton
Citations
- 806 F. Supp. 2d 53
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93269
- 2011 WL 3663753
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding due process did not require defendant, after criminal proceeding, to notify plaintiff of criminal procedure by which he could move for return of property
- holding due process did not require defendant, after criminal proceeding, to notify plaintiff of criminal procedure by which he could move for return of property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Beryl A. Howell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.