Skip to main content
· 8/22/2011

Baird v. Holton

Citations

  • 806 F. Supp. 2d 53
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93269
  • 2011 WL 3663753

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding due process did not require defendant, after criminal proceeding, to notify plaintiff of criminal procedure by which he could move for return of property
  • holding due process did not require defendant, after criminal proceeding, to notify plaintiff of criminal procedure by which he could move for return of property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Beryl A. Howell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.