Skip to main content

Baird v. Gleckler

Citations

  • 11 S.D. 233
  • 76 N.W. 931
  • 1898 S.D. LEXIS 106

Syllabus

<p>Plaintiff claimed that defendant had promised to pay a certain sum on his procuring- a contract for the sale of his land, and that he had done so. Defendant contended that he had so promised provided the sale as agreed on should be consummated. Held, that the question whether the contract of sale could be legally enforced was immaterial, under the - issues, a,nd an instruction that it was invalid was misleading and prejudicial.</p>

Judges: Haney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.