Baird v. Byrne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was proper to consider the Veteran’s entire medical history, including a lengthy period of absence of complaints
• holding that service incurrence may be rebutted by the absence of medical treatment of the claimed disorder for many years after the military discharge
• holding that service connection may be rebutted by the absence of medical treatment for the claimed condition for many years after service
• holding that service incurrence may be rebutted by the absence of medical treatment of the claimed disorder for many years after the military discharge
• holding that service incurrence may be rebutted by the absence of medical treatment of the claimed disorder for many years after the military discharge
• holding that presumption of aggravation \is not for application\ when \clear and convincing [sic] evidence . . . demonstrate[s] . . . that the appellant sustained no permanent increase in disability during service\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).