Baird v. Baird

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a party who proceeds in propria persona is still held to the same standards as attorneys
• stating that a party who appears pro se in a divorce will be held to the same standards as would be required of a member of the bar and that any errors or omissions by the pro se party cannot be made the basis of an appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Amorello v. Monsanto Corp.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1990-11-20· cited 56×
• Vaclav v. Vaclav
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-02-08· cited 40×
• Rutledge v. Rutledge
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-04-03· cited 21×
• Causley v. LaFreniere
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1977-09-08· cited 17×
• Sayre v. Sayre
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-09-28· cited 14×
• Moncada v. Moncada
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1978-01-24· cited 13×
• Rickel v. Rickel
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-06-19· cited 7×
• Wykoff v. Winisky
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1968-03-21· cited 6×