· 3/9/2007
Bailey, Vanessa v. Potter, John E.
Citations
- 478 F.3d 409
- 375 U.S. App. D.C. 179
- 67 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 664
- 19 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 243
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 5522
- 89 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,722
- 99 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1593
- 2007 WL 702189
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing this question without resolving it
- jurisdiction to enforce a set- tlement agreement existed because “claims were still pend- ing before the district court”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rogers, Garland, Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.