Bailey v. Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court cannot consider in its determination regarding substantial justification any allegations of error not contained in the Court's remand order
• holding that the Court cannot consider in its determination regarding ^substantial justification any allegations of error not contained in the Court’s remand order
• holding that consideration of litigation position was not required where Secretary's administrative position had been found to be not substantially justified and awarding fees based on finding that Secretary's position was not substantially justified at administrative stage
• holding that consideration of litigation position was not required where Secretary’s administrative position had been found to be not substantially justified and awarding fees based on finding that Secretary’s position was not substantially justified at administrative stage
• administrative stage position of Secretary not substantially justified when remand was based on both an intervening change in law and determination that Board committed error during adjudication
• in determining the reasonableness of the Secretary’s administrative position, the Court will not consider the appellant’s allegations of error that were not addressed in the Court’s remand order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).