· 3/16/1995
Bailey v. Vanscot Concrete Co.
Citations
- 894 S.W.2d 757
- 38 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 385
- 1995 Tex. LEXIS 24
- 1995 WL 114559
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that A [o]ur duty, as an appellate court, is to consider only the testimony adduced and the evidence tendered and/or admitted at the time of trial @
- explaining that document attached to 18 motion for new trial had no bearing on sufficiency-of-the-evidence examination because document not introduced at trial
- \there is no authority for imposing tort liability on a party due to its failure to withdraw a misleading assumed name certificate\
- “In a merger, the privileges, powers, rights, and duties of the corporation are transferred to the surviving corporation and are there continued and preserved.”
- “Civil suits may be maintained only by or against parties having an actual or legal existence.”
- A there is no authority for imposing tort liability on a party due to its failure to withdraw a misleading assumed name certificate @
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hightower
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.