Skip to main content
· 3/16/1995

Bailey v. Vanscot Concrete Co.

Citations

  • 894 S.W.2d 757
  • 38 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 385
  • 1995 Tex. LEXIS 24
  • 1995 WL 114559

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that A [o]ur duty, as an appellate court, is to consider only the testimony adduced and the evidence tendered and/or admitted at the time of trial @
  • explaining that document attached to 18 motion for new trial had no bearing on sufficiency-of-the-evidence examination because document not introduced at trial
  • \there is no authority for imposing tort liability on a party due to its failure to withdraw a misleading assumed name certificate\
  • “In a merger, the privileges, powers, rights, and duties of the corporation are transferred to the surviving corporation and are there continued and preserved.”
  • “Civil suits may be maintained only by or against parties having an actual or legal existence.”
  • A there is no authority for imposing tort liability on a party due to its failure to withdraw a misleading assumed name certificate @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hightower

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.