Bailey v. Trinity Universal Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court had no jurisdiction under 18 Pa.C.S. § 6111.1(g) to consider a petition to expunge records of an individual’s involuntary commitment under Section 303 filed five years after commitment order was entered
• concluding that the appellant’s Section 302 issues are moot because, “even if [the appellant was] entitled to expunction under [Section] []302, expunction cannot go forward because [the] appellant was also involuntarily committed under [Section] []303”
• holding that this Court may affirm an order on any basis
• holding, inter alia, that subsection 6111.1(g) “only imbues the lower court with jurisdiction to review commitments under [section 302]”
• stating Superior Court is not bound by rationale of trial court and may affirm on any basis
• explaining Superior Court is not bound by rationale of trial court and may affirm on any basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).