Bailey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• absent indication to contrary, use of mandatory term ‘‘shall’’ indicates mandatory leg- islative directive
• protective order precluding defendant from further cross-examination of plaintiff deemed interlocutory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC Partnership
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-12-14· cited 35×
• Bailey v. Medical Examining Board for State Employee Disability Retirement
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-02-25· cited 19×
• Rosado v. Bridgeport Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-07-01· cited 13×
• Bidoae v. Hartford Golf Club
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-09-20· cited 8×
• DeJesus v. R.P.M. Enterprises, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2021-05-18· cited 6×
• Small v. Going Forward, Inc.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2005-08-23· cited 4×
• Silver v. Holtman
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-04-08· cited 4×
• Colon-Collazo v. Cox
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2019-10-01

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Caulkins v. Petrillo
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-05· cited 112×
• Burke v. Fleet National Bank
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-20· cited 33×
• Cantoni v. Xerox Corp.
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-11-09· cited 26×
• Honan v. Dimyan
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-06-12· cited 23×
• Pietraroia v. Northeast Utilities
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-08-08· cited 22×
• Patron v. Konover
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 1996-12-03· cited 15×
• Bryan v. Sheraton-Hartford Hotel
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-04-17· cited 15×
• Schiappa v. Ferrero
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-02-20· cited 12×
• Gibbons v. United Technologies Corp.
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2001-05-15· cited 5×