Skip to main content

Bailey v. State

Citations

  • 162 So. 3d 344
  • 2015 WL 1449603

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the detectives’ testimony was proper and did not constitute improper bolstering because “neither detective said that [the victim and eyewitness] was a ‘credible witness’ or words to that effect”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wells, Salter, Logue

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.