Bailey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that statements by a victim are not admissible to prove subsequent acts of a defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Correll v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-01-14· cited 104×
• Brooks v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2001-04-05· cited 49×
• Hodges v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1992-01-23· cited 24×
• Kingery v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-03-30· cited 21×
• Downs v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-01-18· cited 16×
• Sybers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-28· cited 13×
• Fleming v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-08-24· cited 12×
• Rutledge v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-21· cited 10×
• Duncan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-25· cited 9×
• Wells v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-07-18· cited 8×
• Hunt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-04-13· cited 8×
• Kelley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-04-21· cited 7×
• Somerville v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-15· cited 4×
• Rodriguez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-12-04
• Trenton Nivek Lauwereins v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-09-29

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Van Zant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-06-15· cited 27×
• Kennedy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-05-21· cited 25×