Nevada Supreme Court· 6/14/1978

Bailey v. State

Citations

579 P.2d 1247
94 Nev. 323
1978 Nev. LEXIS 555

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a “224- 6 day delay was not inordinate due to the congestion of the trial calendar”
holding that a \224-day delay was not inordinate due to the congestion of the trial calendar\
concluding that a 224-day delay between arraignment and trial was not a violation of appellants' rights to a speedy trial when there was no evidence that the delay was intentional and when there was no prejudice from the delay
128-day delay between arrest and arraignment did not deny defendant his right to a speedy trial
128-day delay between arrest and arraignment did not deny defendant his right to a speedy trial
defendant was not deprived of his right to a speedy trial where there was no prejudice and no evidence that the delay was intentional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.