Skip to main content
· 11/28/1859

Bailey v. Sonora

Citations

  • 2 F. Cas. 383
  • 1859 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that TDIU claim reasonably raised in 1987 and 1989 but not decided remained pending at RO
  • holding that when an RO fails to adjudicate a reasonably raised claim it remains pending
  • recognizing that a claim for a TDIU is in essence a claim for an increased rating
  • holding that when an RO fails to adjudicate a reasonably raised claim it remains pending
  • recognizing that a claim for a TDIU is in essence a claim for an increased rating
  • holding that, where veteran has filed formal claim pursuant to §§ 3.151 or 3.152, § 3.155(c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.