Bailey v. Richardson
Citations
- 66 Cal. 416
- 5 P. 910
- 1885 Cal. LEXIS 460
Syllabus
<p>Landlord and Tenant—Lease—Covenant Running with Land-Improvements.—A covenant in a lease for the erection, by the lessee, of improvements on the demised premises, and for the purchase thereof by the lessor at the expiration of the term, runs with the land, and is binding on the assignee of the lessor, if such covenant was entered into by the parties to the lease for themselves and their assign?. In such case, the assignee is liable only for breaches of the covenant occurring after he has acquired the estate, and before he has parted with it, or ceased to enjoy its benefits.</p> <p>Id,—Assignment to Lessor—Merged.—Where a lessee, after sub-letting, makes an assignment of the lease to the lessor, who receives and collects, from the sub-lessee the rent reserved in the sub-lease, no merger is created. The lessor comes in as assignee of the reversion, and not as owner of the fee.</p> <p>New Trial — Surprise— Prated—Continuanoe. — Being misled by the prayer of the complaint, conceding it to constitute a surprise, will not warrant a new trial, if the party moving could have relieved himself of' the consequences of the surprise by applying for a continuance, but failed, to make such application.</p>
Judges: McKinstry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kauffman v. De MutiisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1948-02-04· cited 41×
- Noble v. TweedyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1949-03-21· cited 35×
- Jameson v. HaywardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-04-03· cited 27×
- Gardner v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-02-15· cited 18×
- Mitchell v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1906-11-05· cited 12×
- Marin County Hospital District v. CicurelCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1957-10-08· cited 11×
- Scott v. MullinsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-12-18· cited 10×
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. HellingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1935-12-27· cited 7×
- Lloyd Corp. v. RiddellS.D. California· 1963-10-09· cited 2×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Schellhous v. BallCalifornia Supreme Court· 1866-07-01· cited 32×
- Salisbury v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1884-12-13· cited 20×
- Wilcox v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1860-07-15· cited 18×
- Pfaff v. GoldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1879-03-27· cited 14×
- Bell v. TennyOhio Supreme Court· 1876-12-15· cited 14×
- Sahler v. SignerNew York Supreme Court· 1865-12-04· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.