Bailey v. Ravalli County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that due to the constant changes to the statutes governing roads, it “becomes critically necessary to consider the statutes as actually in effect at any specific date”
• reasoning that 16 although the record did not positively disclose that notice was sent by registered mail to the petitioners and all adjacent landowners after abandonment, a similarly worded curative statute applied
• abandonment of public roadway by county commissioners meant that fee in street reverted to abutting landowners
• “In the absence of any question being raised by abutting landowners or petitioners in the subsequent period of more than thirty years, we conclude that the proceedings cannot now be questioned.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).