Skip to main content
· 4/26/1993

Bailey v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.

Citations

  • 989 F.2d 794
  • 1993 WL 112748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that silence in the government’s specifications regarding a particular product feature precludes application of the government contractor defense
  • holding that the government contractor defense applies regardless of the label attached to the claim, as long as the three Boyle conditions are satisfied
  • denying summary judgment based on government contractor defense where manufacturing defect was alleged
  • record did not demonstrate that Air Force specifications for fighter jet addressed metallurgic content of bellows canister
  • “[T]he requirements of ‘reasonably precise specifications’ and conformity with them refer to the particular feature of the product claimed to be defective.”
  • “[T]he requirements of ‘reasonably precise specifications’ and conformity with them refer to the particular feature of the product claimed to be defective.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duhé, Barksdale, Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.