Bailey v. Hanford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that less tangible injuries like “lost business” and the diminished “value of [a] law practice” can suffice as injuries under the UCL
• \[C]ourts have not yet defined the contours of the causation element under the 'unlawful' prong of the UCL.\
• “[T]he notion of ‘lost money’ under the UCL is not limited[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).