Washington Supreme Court· 1/30/1969
Bailey v. Gallagher
Citations
- 450 P.2d 802
- 75 Wash. 2d 260
- 1969 Wash. LEXIS 735
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The function of a writ of habeas corpus is to inquire into the legality of the particular restraint being then imposed upon the petitioner. It is not to inquire into the validity of some future restraint that may or may not be imposed.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ex Parte AlbaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-06-09· cited 49×
- State v. HavertyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1970-10-26· cited 32×
- Riggins v. RhayWashington Supreme Court· 1969-01-30· cited 21×
- Ogden v. KlundtCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1976-05-18· cited 9×
- Proll v. MorrisWashington Supreme Court· 1975-04-24· cited 8×
- Alba, Ex Parte John AvalosCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-06-09
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.