Bailey v. Fulwood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The only proper defendant in an action under the Privacy Act ‘is the agency maintaining the challenged record.’” (quoting Ingram v. Gonzales, 501 F. Supp. 2d 180, 185 n.2 (D.D.C. 2007))
• “[Severance of claims under Rule 21 results in the creation of separate actions.”
• “[I]n this Circuit, ‘the statute of limitations period set forth in 5 U.S.C. § 552a(g)(5) is not a jurisdictional bar.’” (quoting Kursar v. Transportation Sec. Admin., 751 F. Supp. 2d 154, 165 (D.D.C. 2010) (Walton, J.))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).