Bailey v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance Exchange

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “ ‘rehabilitation’ should be construed to include vocational rehabilitation as an allowable expense under § 3107(a) of the Michigan no-fault act”
• holding that “ ‘rehabilitation’ should be construed to include vocational rehabilitation as an allowable expense under § 3107(a) of the Michigan no-fault act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).